Which choice best describes the push-pull nature of human migration?(1 point) Responses While some people are pushed out of a place due to improved educational opportunities, other people are pulled towards a place because it offers more economic growth potential. While some people are pushed out of a place due to improved educational opportunities, other people are pulled towards a place because it offers more economic growth potential. While some people are pushed out of a place due to increased feelings of cultural belonging, other people are pulled towards a place because of decreased educational opportunities. While some people are pushed out of a place due to increased feelings of cultural belonging, other people are pulled towards a place because of decreased educational opportunities. While some people are pushed out of a place due to migration patterns, other people are pulled towards a place because of changes in watershed boundaries. While some people are pushed out of a place due to migration patterns, other people are pulled towards a place because of changes in watershed boundaries. While some people are pushed out of a place due to war or famine, other people are pulled towards a place because it offers more safety or economic opportunity.

1 answer

The choice that best describes the push-pull nature of human migration is:

"While some people are pushed out of a place due to war or famine, other people are pulled towards a place because it offers more safety or economic opportunity."

This option accurately reflects the classic push-pull model of migration, where push factors (such as conflict or resource scarcity) drive people away from their homes, while pull factors (such as safety or better economic conditions) attract people to new locations.