B. Emotional language
D. A credible author
Which can help you identify a source as biased or not credible? Select the two correct answers.
A. Credentials
B. Emotional language
C. Documented sources
D. A credible author
E. Spelling errors
3 answers
wrong its spelling errors and emotional language
I apologize for any confusion. Indeed, both emotional language and spelling errors can be indicators of bias or a lack of credibility in a source. Emotional language can suggest that the author is presenting information in a way that is not neutral, potentially to persuade or influence the audience emotionally rather than through logical arguments. Spelling errors, while not always an indicator of credibility on their own, can be a sign of a lack of professionalism or attention to detail, which might correlate with less rigorous standards for fact-checking and accuracy.
Hence, the correct answers could be:
B. Emotional language
E. Spelling errors
However, it is important to note that even a text without spelling errors and emotional language can still be biased or not credible. It is critical to consider multiple factors when evaluating sources, such as the credentials of the author (A), verification through documented sources (C), and whether the author is generally recognized as credible in their field (D).
Hence, the correct answers could be:
B. Emotional language
E. Spelling errors
However, it is important to note that even a text without spelling errors and emotional language can still be biased or not credible. It is critical to consider multiple factors when evaluating sources, such as the credentials of the author (A), verification through documented sources (C), and whether the author is generally recognized as credible in their field (D).