Which best describes how the results of experiments investigating the relationship between microscopic and macroscopic phenomena affect a model of molecular theory?(1 point)ResponsesConsistent results require throwing out the model entirely, while inconsistent results support the validity of the model.Consistent results require throwing out the model entirely, while inconsistent results support the validity of the model.Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results indicate the need to modify the model.Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results indicate the need to modify the model.Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results require throwing out the model entirely.Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results require throwing out the model entirely.Consistent results indicate the need to modify the model, while inconsistent results support the validity of the model.

Answer 1

The correct response is: Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results indicate the need to modify the model.

This accurately describes how experiments can affect a scientific model: consistent results reinforce the model's credibility, whereas discrepancies suggest that the model may need adjustments to better explain the observed phenomena.