Which best describes how the results of experiments investigating the relationship between

microscopic and macroscopic phenomena affect a model of molecular theory?(1 point)
Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results indicate the need to modify
the model.
Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results require throwing out the
model entirely.
Consistent results indicate the need to modify the model, while inconsistent results support the validity of
the model.
Consistent results require throwing out the model entirely, while inconsistent results support the validity of
the model.

1 answer

The best description is: Consistent results support the validity of the model, while inconsistent results indicate the need to modify the model.

This statement reflects the scientific process, where models are refined and adjusted based on experimental evidence. Consistent findings generally reinforce the model's accuracy, while discrepancies prompt further investigation and potential modifications to the model.