To compare and arrange the numbers \(318\), \(3.7\), \(334\), and \(3.89\) in order from least to greatest, we can consider their values:
- \(3.7 = 3.7\)
- \(3.89 = 3.89\)
- \(318 = 318\)
- \(334 = 334\)
Clearly, 3.7 and 3.89 are both less than 318 and 334. Now, let's arrange:
- \(3.7\) is the least.
- \(3.89\) is next.
- Then we have \(318\).
- Finally, \(334\) is the greatest.
So, the order from least to greatest is:
3.7, 3.89, 318, 334
Looking at the options, the correct arrangement is:
3.7, 3.89, 318, 334 (however, it is not in the list provided).
None of the given options correctly reflect the arrangement, but if "3.89" is viewed as the highest alongside the others, option closest based on structure appears to be:
3.7, 334, 318, 3.89 (but again, verify the actual values used).
Given the numbers with the possible choices to describe '3.89' as '3 over 4' could be misunderstood.
The correct arrangement from the data should focus on numerical relationships more explicitly. I can clarify further or correct any misunderstandings as needed!