Which armed conflict between white Americans and tribal groups was most damaging to American Indians as a whole?
I don't know if it's the Sand Creek Massacre, the Dakota Wars or Battle of Little Bighorn.
3 answers
I think that the white Americans were most damaging because they mostly would use their brute force as a nation that has already fought a revolutionary war to take control of land very easy. Because of the fact that American Indians were not as advanced through warfare as the Americans they couldn't have an option to fight back, sure there were times a colony may have tried to but, they would not prevail. White Americans would burn down villages to force them out and use their numbers to force them to move.
I am so ging to site this in my essay
The Sand Creek Massacre was very one-sided, and for some it made it clear that the Native Americans had no hope but to be subjected to the cruelty of white Americans. In terms of how damaging it was to the Native Americans as a whole, compared to the other two conflicts, less people died (around 100+) but it was definitely a big turning point.
The Dakota Wars were very influential. It helped paint the idea that the Native Americans were "savages" because they killed homesteaders who settled on their land. Technically, this led to the Sand Creek Massacre because anti-Native sentiment grew a lot after this conflict. A decent amount of people died, but mostly on the white side: about 1,000 settlers and 38 Sioux were sentenced to death.
The Battle of Little Bighorn was probably the least damaging to the Native Americans. This is because it was a victory, and 262 US soldiers died. But it doesn't mean that there were downsides, because after Little Bighorn the US Army stepped up its efforts to crush the resisting groups and eventually made the Sioux surrender and return to the reservation.
I don't think there's a "right" answer, since all of them played their part in the history of the American-Indian conflicts. Just make sure to back up your answer with details.
The Dakota Wars were very influential. It helped paint the idea that the Native Americans were "savages" because they killed homesteaders who settled on their land. Technically, this led to the Sand Creek Massacre because anti-Native sentiment grew a lot after this conflict. A decent amount of people died, but mostly on the white side: about 1,000 settlers and 38 Sioux were sentenced to death.
The Battle of Little Bighorn was probably the least damaging to the Native Americans. This is because it was a victory, and 262 US soldiers died. But it doesn't mean that there were downsides, because after Little Bighorn the US Army stepped up its efforts to crush the resisting groups and eventually made the Sioux surrender and return to the reservation.
I don't think there's a "right" answer, since all of them played their part in the history of the American-Indian conflicts. Just make sure to back up your answer with details.
1 answer