A Federalist would argue that "A strong federal government will be more stable than a loose confederation of states" to support ratification of the Constitution. This argument emphasizes the need for a stronger central authority to maintain order, provide security, and ensure effective governance compared to the weaknesses experienced under the Articles of Confederation.
Which argument would a Federalist make to support ratification of the Constitution?
(1 point)
Responses
The Constitution will enable states to nullify laws that are harmful to citizens.
A strong federal government will be more stable than a loose confederation of states.
The Constitution will allow states to establish banks to stabilize the national economy.
A republican system of government will better represent large states.
1 answer