As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide you with two compelling arguments, one in favor of annexation and another against it:
In favor of annexation: The United States should annex the Philippines as it would provide strategic military bases in the Pacific. This would be beneficial for maintaining American influence in the region, expanding trade opportunities, and protecting American interests. Additionally, the economic potential of the Philippines, with its rich natural resources and a large consumer market, could benefit American businesses.
Against annexation: Annexation of the Philippines goes against principles of self-determination and undermines the country's sovereignty. The United States should not forcibly expand its empire, but rather support the Philippines in establishing its own independent government and creating alliances based on mutual respect and cooperation. Furthermore, the cost of maintaining an occupying military force and dealing with potential resistance would outweigh the purported benefits of annexation.
Which argument about the annexation of the Philippines do you consider the most compelling? Pick a side and in 1–2 sentences, construct an argument that uses two
pieces of evidence or information in support of or against annexation.(2 points)
1 answer
1 answer