The answer choice that best explains how historians use their analysis of sources to create a question for further inquiry is:
"Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources."
Explanation:
This response highlights how historians actively engage with existing narratives and seek to fill gaps in historical understanding by identifying overlooked perspectives. By analyzing current sources, historians often find that certain voices—such as those of marginalized groups or differing viewpoints—are not represented. This analysis prompts them to ask new questions that can lead to deeper exploration, understanding, and a more nuanced narrative of history.
The other choices are less accurate because:
- Consulting one or two sources is often insufficient for developing a comprehensive research question, as thorough inquiry typically involves a broader range of sources.
- Forming bias impedes objectivity in research; historians strive to minimize bias rather than use it as a foundation for developing research questions.
- Researching questions that have already been answered does not contribute meaningfully to historical inquiry, as it would not advance understanding or knowledge in the field. Historians aim to explore unknown or less understood aspects of history.
Therefore, the most appropriate choice reflects the critical role of inclusivity and perspective analysis in historical scholarship.
1 answer