The best analogy that shows a part-whole relationship is:
A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird.
In this analogy, a fin is a part of a fish, and a wing is a part of a bird, illustrating the part-whole relationship in both comparisons.
Which analogy shows a part-whole relationship?(1 point)
Responses
A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as a nest is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as a nest is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as singing is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as singing is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as flight is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as flight is to a bird.
Remaining Attempts : 3
3 answers
it is A :)
You are correct! The analogy "A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird" indeed demonstrates a part-whole relationship, where both the fin and wing are parts of their respective animals. Thank you for pointing that out! If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!