Sure! Let’s go through each question step by step.
Question 1
A. Write a Two-Variable Equation:
Let:
- \( x \) = the number of board books
- \( y \) = the number of soft cover books
The equation to represent the spending is: \[ 1.50x + 0.50y = 20 \]
B. Check for 10 Board Books and 5 Soft Cover Books:
Substituting \( x = 10 \) and \( y = 5 \) into the equation: \[ 1.50(10) + 0.50(5) = 15 + 2.5 = 17.5 \]
This does not equal $20, so it is not possible for Santiago to have bought 10 board books and 5 soft cover books.
C. Graph the Solution Set:
To graph the equation, rearrange it to slope-intercept form \( y = mx + b \):
\[ 0.50y = 20 - 1.50x \]
\[ y = -3x + 40 \]
On graph paper, plot this line, marking the x-intercept and y-intercept.
D. Describe the Constraints:
The constraints of this situation include:
- \( x \geq 0 \) (number of board books cannot be negative)
- \( y \geq 0 \) (number of soft cover books cannot be negative)
E. List of Viable Solutions:
From the graph, for integer solutions, check the intersection points within the first quadrant defined by constraints.
F. Determine the Number of Each Type of Book if Santiago Bought 34 Books:
Set up the new equation: \[ x + y = 34 \] Now you have a system of equations:
- \( 1.50x + 0.50y = 20 \)
- \( x + y = 34 \)
You can solve this system to find the values of \( x \) and \( y \).
Question 2
A. Write a Two-Variable Inequality:
Let:
- \( c \) = number of children
- \( a \) = number of adults
The inequality to represent the cost is: \[ 150 + 10.50c + 5.50a \leq 300 \]
B. Check for 10 Children and 5 Adults:
Substituting \( c = 10 \) and \( a = 5 \): \[ 150 + 10.50(10) + 5.50(5) = 150 + 105 + 27.5 = 282.5 \leq 300 \]
This is possible!
C. Graph the Solution Set:
Rearranging the inequality to slope-intercept form: \[ 10.50c + 5.50a \leq 150 \]
Graph using intercepts determined from the equation.
D. Describe the Constraints:
- \( c \geq 1 \) (at least one child)
- \( a \geq 1 \) (at least one adult)
E. Show All Viable Solutions on the Graph:
Mark solutions within the constraints on your graph.
F. Recommendation to Meha:
Based on the budget and constraints, a balanced number of adults and children (e.g., 10 children and 5 adults) could be suggested since it fits within budget.
Question 3
A. Is (1,6) a Solution?
Substituting into both equations:
- For the first equation: \(-1 + 6 = 5\) ✔️
- For the second equation: \(6 = (1-3)^2 + 2 \rightarrow 6 = 4 + 2\) ❌
So, (1,6) is not a solution.
B. Solve the System using Substitution:
From the first equation, express \( y \): \[ y = 5 + x \]
Substituting into the second, solve for \( x \).
C. Graph the System of Equations:
Once solved, graph both equations and label intersection points.
D. Infinite Solutions with a Linear and Quadratic:
Yes, if the quadratic just touches the line (tangential intersection).
Question 4
A. Is (0,3) a Solution?
Substituting into both equations:
- For the first: \(0 + 3 = 32\) ❌
- For the second: \(3 = -2 \times 0 + 10\) ✔️
(0,3) is not a solution.
B. Solve using Elimination:
Align both equations and solve for \( x \) and \( y \) through elimination.
C. Infinite Solutions with Two Linear Equations:
Yes, two linear equations can overlap entirely, indicating infinite solutions.
Question 5
A. Write a System of Two Linear Inequalities:
- \( y \leq 2x + 3 \)
- \( y > -x + 4 \)
B. Determine if Point is a Solution:
Test a point (e.g., (1, 4)):
- For \( y \leq 2x + 3 \) → \( 4 \leq 2(1) + 3 → 4 \leq 5 \) ✔️
- For \( y > -x + 4 \) → \( 4 > -1 + 4 → 4 \not> 3 \) ❌
C. Graph the Inequalities:
Graph the lines and shade regions as per the inequalities.
D. System with No Solutions:
Yes, parallel lines indicate no solution. No intersection on a graph would demonstrate this.
These steps should guide you in answering each part of the questions with the necessary definitions, explanations, and graphs! Depending on your capabilities, you may need the graphs plotted on graph paper as required.