When is judicial activism warranted by the Supreme Court? (1 point)

Answer 1

Judicial activism is generally considered warranted by the Supreme Court when it seeks to address issues of justice, protect individual rights, or uphold constitutional principles in the face of inadequate legislative action or when laws may be outdated or unjust. This can occur in cases involving civil rights, social justice, and other matters where the courts step in to safeguard fundamental freedoms or rectify legislative inaction. In such instances, the Court may interpret the Constitution in a way that reflects contemporary values and societal needs.