When evaluating an argument with an unstated premise would the most approprate tactis be to don't do anthing? If the arguer had wanted a claim to be included, they would have included it. WOuld I them evaluated the argument as it stands?

Answer 1

I can't even imagine an argument with an unstated premise. Unless there's a claim or premise, there's no argument, is there?

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/01/

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/argument.htm

http://www.powa.org/content/blogcategory/21/111/