When evaluating a claim which of the following would tell you that it is not a good claim A the evidence contains both facts and opinions B The evidence does not contain a testimony C The argument is supported by facts and reasons D The argument does not come to a local conclusion

1 answer

To evaluate a claim effectively, you would consider all the given options. However, the option that most clearly indicates that the claim is not a good one is:

D The argument does not come to a local conclusion.

A good claim typically leads to a logical conclusion that is relevant to the argument being made. If the argument does not reach a conclusion that is relevant and logical, it suggests weaknesses in the argument’s formulation or evidence.

While the other options (A, B, and C) describe aspects that can be evaluated as part of the evidence, they do not inherently disqualify a claim on their own. For instance, evidence containing both facts and opinions (A) doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bad; it depends on how they are used. Similarly, the lack of testimony (B) may not always detract from a claim if it is adequately supported by other types of evidence. Meanwhile, supported arguments (C) often strengthen claims rather than weaken them.