When constructing an argument for patents, what is the best example of using evidence to support patents? (1 point)

Question

Periods of American and world history demonstrate that patents are not necessary for economic growth.
Patents weaken business competition because it prevents competitors from using specific ideas, techniques, or procedures.
If a person has locked the intellectual property rights of an idea or an invention, others are precluded from taking that idea and potentially improving it.
Society benefits more from the intellectual pursuits of the individual and must seek ways to reward the inventors.

Answer 1

The best example of using evidence to support patents from the options provided is:

Society benefits more from the intellectual pursuits of the individual and must seek ways to reward the inventors.

This statement highlights the positive impact that patents have on innovation and economic development by emphasizing the societal benefits of rewarding inventors. By providing a legal framework that encourages individuals to pursue their intellectual creations, patents can lead to advancements that benefit society as a whole. This argument can be supported with evidence showing how patents stimulate research and development, lead to new products, and ultimately contribute to economic growth.