Perfect duties are those that must always be followed and are morally binding at all times, regardless of the situation. These duties are specific, clear-cut, and have no exceptions. For example, the duty not to lie or steal is considered a perfect duty.
Imperfect duties, on the other hand, are not always morally binding and may be subject to interpretation based on the circumstances. These duties are more general and flexible, allowing individuals to prioritize and choose when and how to fulfill them. For example, the duty to help others in need or to improve oneself is considered an imperfect duty.
Under the principle of universality, perfect duties must be applicable to all individuals in all situations, as they are seen as necessary and self-evident principles that everyone should follow. Imperfect duties, on the other hand, require more judgment and consideration of context, as they allow for some degree of flexibility and interpretation in their application.
What's different between perfect duty and imperfect duty under principal of universality
1 answer