If you reversed the order of paragraphs 3 and 4, the responses suggest several potential outcomes:
-
The broader implications of an idea would be discussed before the reader understands what the idea is: This indicates that presenting the broader implications first could lead to confusion, as readers may not yet have the necessary context.
-
The importance of the problem would become clearer because the worldwide impact would be centered sooner: This implies that starting with broader implications might help highlight the significance of the issue more quickly, potentially engaging readers early on.
-
The extent of the problem would be lost on readers because they would not receive all the data: Here, the concern is that if the order is reversed, crucial data and context that illustrate the severity of the problem might be overlooked.
-
The focus of the article would shift from old statistics to trends in the industry: This suggests that a change in order could affect the article's emphasis, possibly moving the discussion away from foundational data towards a discussion of current trends.
Overall, reversing these paragraphs would likely lead to a mix of benefits and drawbacks, primarily concerning clarity and the effectiveness of conveying the problem's significance.