Reversing the order of paragraphs 3 and 4 in the article "Y Journalism Has a Gender Problem" could lead to several changes in the narrative and its effectiveness in conveying the issue. Here’s how each of the points you mentioned would play out:
-
Focus Shift: By presenting the old stats and trends in the industry before discussing the importance of the problem, the article would start by framing the issue within a historical context. This might provide readers with a clearer background but could also dilute the urgency of the problem if the reader is not yet fully aware of its implications.
-
Clarity of Importance: With the worldwide impact discussed earlier, the reader might become more engaged with the significance of gender disparities in journalism right away. The immediate framing of the issue could capture attention, emphasizing its relevance in a global sense without first being bogged down by data and statistics.
-
Loss of Extent Understanding: If the extent of the problem is presented after the broader implications, it could confuse readers. Without the supporting data and context, readers might struggle to grasp the full scale of the issue, leading to a potential underestimation of its seriousness. Understanding the depth of the problem typically requires solid evidence and statistics that ground the discussion.
Overall, the primary idea suggested by reversing these paragraphs is that the structure of an article significantly affects reader comprehension and engagement. The introduction of data and trends as initial focal points may generate interest but could also risk a diluted understanding of the broader implications if readers lack insight into the severity of the problem. The effectiveness of the article in conveying its message depends heavily on the logical flow of information.
1 answer