An economist would likely expect that "Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse." The rationale behind this expectation is that stricter negative incentives—such as harsher punishments—create a stronger deterrent effect, which discourages negative behavior. While clearer expectations may play a role as well, the more immediate concern in economic terms would be the increased consequences associated with breaking the rules.
What would an economist expect if the negative incentives for bad behavior in a school became stricter? (1 point) Responses Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer. Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer. Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse. Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse. Students would be more likely to break the rules, because more rules are available to break. Students would be more likely to break the rules, because more rules are available to break. Students would be more likely to break the rules, because the feelings of excitement are higher. Students would be more likely to break the rules, because the feelings of excitement are higher.
1 answer