What was a significant problem with the Articles of Confederation?(1 point)

Responses

each state could decide if they wanted to enforce laws passed by Congress instead of it having to happen
each state could decide if they wanted to enforce laws passed by Congress instead of it having to happen

The national (central) government would always side with larger states when issues occurred
The national (central) government would always side with larger states when issues occurred

small states had just as much say as larger states
small states had just as much say as larger states

states could not stop the central government from taxing them

9 answers

The significant problem with the Articles of Confederation was that each state could decide if they wanted to enforce laws passed by Congress instead of it having to happen. This lack of a strong central authority to enforce laws made it difficult for the national government to effectively govern and address issues, leading to ineffectiveness and conflicts among states.

What was significant about the new land added in the Northwest Territory under the Northwest Ordinance?(1 point)
Responses

religious freedom was not allowed
religious freedom was not allowed

slavery was outlawed
slavery was outlawed

trial by jury was not allowed
trial by jury was not allowed

it ignored how to admit other new states

The significant aspect of the new land added in the Northwest Territory under the Northwest Ordinance was that slavery was outlawed. This ordinance established a system for governing the territory and included provisions that prohibited slavery in the newly created states, setting a precedent for the future expansion of the United States.

What effect did the Three-Fifths Compromise have on Southern states?(1 point)
Responses

It helped increase the number of enslaved people.
It helped increase the number of enslaved people.

It gave the South the power to outvote the North.
It gave the South the power to outvote the North.

It limited the number of states that allowed slavery.
It limited the number of states that allowed slavery.

By allowing enslaved people to be counted as a 3/5 of a person in Southern states, it gave Southern states more representation in Congress

The effect of the Three-Fifths Compromise on Southern states was that by allowing enslaved people to be counted as three-fifths of a person in Southern states, it gave Southern states more representation in Congress. This compromise increased the political power of Southern states by enhancing their representation based on their population, which included enslaved individuals, even though they were not granted any rights.

What was important about the Bill of Rights?(1 point)
Responses

It outlined a structure that gave the government the right to tax its citizens.
It outlined a structure that gave the government the right to tax its citizens.

It established a detailed justice system.
It established a detailed justice system.

It provided guidelines for ensuring basic citizen rights.
It provided guidelines for ensuring basic citizen rights.

It ensured the states should have more power than the central government.

The important aspect of the Bill of Rights is that it provided guidelines for ensuring basic citizen rights. The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments to the Constitution and was created to protect individual liberties and rights from government infringement.

What did Anti-federalists want?(1 point)
Responses

weak central government (national government over all the states)
weak central government (national government over all the states)

strong central government (national government over all the states)

Anti-federalists wanted a weak central government (national government over all the states). They were concerned that a strong central government would threaten individual liberties and the sovereignty of the states. They advocated for more power to be maintained at the state level.

Similar Questions
  1. What was a significant problem with the Articles of Confederation?a. each state could decide if they wanted to enforce laws
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 11 answers
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 15 answers
more similar questions