Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
What type of number will result from 3.4059...−85 ?(1 point) Responses Rational, because both numbers are rational. Rational, b...Question
What type of number will result from 3.4059...−85
?(1 point)
Responses
Irrational, because both numbers are irrational.
Irrational, because both numbers are irrational.
Rational, because both numbers are rational.
Rational, because both numbers are rational.
Irrational, because one number is irrational.
Irrational, because one number is irrational.
Rational, because one number is rational.
Rational, because one number is rational.
?(1 point)
Responses
Irrational, because both numbers are irrational.
Irrational, because both numbers are irrational.
Rational, because both numbers are rational.
Rational, because both numbers are rational.
Irrational, because one number is irrational.
Irrational, because one number is irrational.
Rational, because one number is rational.
Rational, because one number is rational.
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine the type of number resulting from the operation \( 3.4059... - 85 \), we need to analyze the numbers involved.
- \( 3.4059... \) is a decimal that appears to be a repeating (or non-terminating) decimal, which suggests it may be an irrational number. However, we need to clarify: if it continues forever without repeating, then it would indeed be an irrational number. But if it is a rational number (which usually has repeating decimals), we could treat it as rational.
- \( 85 \) is a whole number, which is clearly a rational number.
Now, let's examine the operation:
- If \( 3.4059... \) is rational, then subtracting 85 (another rational number) from it will yield another rational number.
- If \( 3.4059... \) is irrational, subtracting 85 (rational) from it will result in an irrational number.
Given that repeating decimals are usually rational (like \( \frac{34}{10} \) as an example), it is more reasonable to classify \( 3.4059... \) as rational in this context, making the operation:
\[ \text{Rational number} - \text{Rational number} = \text{Rational number} \]
Hence, the correct response is:
**Rational, because both numbers are rational.**
- \( 3.4059... \) is a decimal that appears to be a repeating (or non-terminating) decimal, which suggests it may be an irrational number. However, we need to clarify: if it continues forever without repeating, then it would indeed be an irrational number. But if it is a rational number (which usually has repeating decimals), we could treat it as rational.
- \( 85 \) is a whole number, which is clearly a rational number.
Now, let's examine the operation:
- If \( 3.4059... \) is rational, then subtracting 85 (another rational number) from it will yield another rational number.
- If \( 3.4059... \) is irrational, subtracting 85 (rational) from it will result in an irrational number.
Given that repeating decimals are usually rational (like \( \frac{34}{10} \) as an example), it is more reasonable to classify \( 3.4059... \) as rational in this context, making the operation:
\[ \text{Rational number} - \text{Rational number} = \text{Rational number} \]
Hence, the correct response is:
**Rational, because both numbers are rational.**
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.