What transformation would need to happen for the equation of the line to be y=2/3x ? (1 point) Responses Shift the graph right 3, down 2 Shift the graph right 3, down 2 Shift the graph left 2 Shift the graph left 2 Shift the graph down 3, left 2 Shift the graph down 3, left 2 Shift the graph down 2

heres an example of what the graph would look like, (0, 2) (3, 4) (6, 6) (9, 8)

1 answer

The equation of the line you provided is \( y = \frac{2}{3}x \), which has a slope of \( \frac{2}{3} \) and passes through the origin (0,0).

If you're looking for transformations from another line to achieve the line \( y = \frac{2}{3}x \), it's important to know the original line's equation. However, based solely on the options provided and without further context, let's analyze:

  • Shift right 3, down 2 would change the y-intercept and affect the line position but not the slope.
  • Shift left 2 would also affect the line's position but not change the slope to \(\frac{2}{3}\).
  • Shift down 3, left 2 would similarly affect the line's position.
  • Shift down 2 would affect the y-intercept.

If we assume you are starting from another line, for example, \( y = mx + b \), the transformation would depend on the original slope \( m \) and y-intercept \( b \).

Without knowing the original line, it's challenging to determine the specific transformation needed to achieve \( y = \frac{2}{3}x \). If the line you were transforming from had a different slope, you would need to apply a transformation that adjusts the slope to \( \frac{2}{3} \).

If you're just asked about shifting operations without an original line to reference, then none of the given options would directly yield the line \( y = \frac{2}{3}x \).

Please provide the original line's equation for a more precise answer.