The correct answer would be [Choice C] Find a way to rationalize the results.
When the results of an experiment do not support the hypothesis, it is important to analyze the findings thoroughly and think critically. This may involve considering different explanations for the unexpected results, evaluating any potential errors or flaws in the experimental design or methodology, and seeking alternative interpretations.
It is crucial to understand that negative or unexpected results are just as valuable and informative as those that support the initial hypothesis. They can provide new insights, raise new research questions, and contribute to the overall scientific knowledge.
Publishing negative results or moving on without further investigating the discrepancy (Choice A and Choice B) may lead to misinterpretations and hinder scientific progress. Similarly, using a different method and retesting (Choice D) should be done only after careful analysis and consideration of the initial results.
Therefore, finding a way to rationalize the results allows for a deeper understanding of the phenomenon under investigation and sets the foundation for potential future experiments or adjustments to the hypothesis.
What should you do if the results of your experiment do not support your hypothesis?
[Choice A] Go ahead and publish your results
[Choice B] Consider the results abnormal and continue
working
[Choice C] Find a way to rationalize the results
[Choice D] Use a different method and retest
1 answer