What scenes do you find completely useless to the narrative of "Godzilla: King of Monsters" (2019)?

For example, I find that at 30:51, when Dr. Chen shows images of historical paintings, most of which irrelevant to the narrative, as most of what she shows is not mentioned again to show weaknesses or even add to the film; I find it incredibly lazy to not create fictional pieces to drive the movie forward. instead they used images like the Egyptian Sphinx or a Chinese dragon... or the famous "Red Dragon" painting by William Blake.

1 answer

Another scene that I found unnecessary was the quick shot of a news anchor reporting on Godzilla's movements across the world. It didn't add anything to the story and felt more like filler content. Additionally, the scene where the characters discuss the philosophical implications of Godzilla's existence felt out of place and didn't contribute much to the overall narrative. Overall, I think these scenes could have been cut without affecting the flow or impact of the film.
Similar Questions
  1. rephrase this completelyMany people believe that the horror genre is only based around monsters, villains, and gruesome scenes,
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 3 answers
  2. Which description applies to a flashback?a a narrative skips around in time, flashing to scenes from a protagonist's earlier
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 3 answers
more similar questions