What presidential power under the constitution that the anti-federalist to urge for Bill of Rights was it veto power over act of Congress or the power to declare states of emergency without consulting Congress or the power to carry out the laws passed by Congress or military power as commander and chief

Answer 1

The Anti-Federalists were particularly concerned about the potential for the federal government to become too powerful and infringe upon individual liberties. They argued for the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to explicitly protect those liberties. Among the presidential powers mentioned, the veto power over acts of Congress is not specifically what the Anti-Federalists focused on when advocating for a Bill of Rights.

The primary concern of the Anti-Federalists related more broadly to the powers of the federal government, including military power as commander-in-chief, but their argument centered around the need to protect individual rights rather than a specific fear of presidential powers like the veto. Ultimately, their push for the Bill of Rights was aimed at safeguarding personal freedoms against potential government overreach, rather than addressing one specific presidential power in isolation.

So, while military power could be a concern, the Anti-Federalists' main focus in urging for the Bill of Rights was primarily about protecting individual liberties rather than any single presidential power.