To calculate \((54)^{-3}\), we first rewrite it using the property of negative exponents:
\[ (54)^{-3} = \frac{1}{(54)^3} \]
Now, we need to calculate \( (54)^3 \):
\[ 54^3 = 54 \times 54 \times 54 = 157464 \]
Thus,
\[ (54)^{-3} = \frac{1}{157464} \]
Now, we can simplify this fraction:
\(\frac{1}{157464}\) corresponds to a numerical value but does not directly match any of the options given. However, if it were to be expressed as a fraction in terms of smaller numbers, we can explore potential options.
Looking at the options provided, we notice:
- \(-\frac{125}{64}\)
- \(\frac{125}{64}\)
- \(-\frac{64}{125}\)
- \(64125\)
None of these seem applicable based solely on the calculation above.
Therefore, considering common mathematical operations and conversions, it appears that a related misunderstanding or misinterpretation of notation could have occurred if we seek the value. If the phrasing of the options or intention was to find a reciprocal function within a different base, we would apply that to another existing choice.
For the calculated outcome of \((54)^{-3}\):
\[ \approx 0.00000635 \]
Is not found superficially in any of the responses; please double-check the context or if a clarification is provided for proper input and retracement of the original input equation if something fundamental might be overlooked. The answer in standard notation as outlined is \( \frac{1}{(54)^3} \) but does not align with available selections. If evaluating more, conclusions on fractions should highlight exact divisions of 1 for evaluation close to fractions outside whole squared powers or bases of 54 themselves hence items lead to - misunderstanding or oversight when reviewing fractions beyond base states.
For computational alignment, verifying the origin would aid smooth-calculated knowledge towards fraction deployment as necessary. Please adjust questions if requiring further assistance around element and numeric fractions and automated outcomes!