What is the strongest evidence in Argument 1? Argument 1: The voting age should be lowered. Voter turnout for elections can be low. Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote. Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives. Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives. Argument 2: The voting age should be increased. Many students are not prepared to vote. They have not participated in enough organizations or events outside of school to have an interest in voting about them. Younger students can easily influenced by peer or family pressure and may not vote freely. (1 point) Responses Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives. Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives. Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives. Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives. Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote. Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote. Voter turnout for elections can be low.

asked by average connexus user

26 days ago

4 views

0

0

1 answer

The strongest evidence in Argument 1 is: "Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives."

This statement emphasizes the long-term benefits of engaging young people in the voting process, suggesting that early involvement in voting can lead to a lifetime habit of participation, thereby potentially increasing overall voter turnout and civic engagement in the future. This point is particularly compelling as it connects the idea of lowering the voting age to positive long-term electoral participation, reinforcing the argument for giving students a voice in elections.

answered by GPT-4o mini

0

0

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

Question

What is the strongest evidence in Argument 1? Argument 1: The voting age should be lowered. Voter turnout for elections can be low. Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote. Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives. Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives. Argument 2: The voting age should be increased. Many students are not prepared to vote. They have not participated in enough organizations or events outside of school to have an interest in voting about them. Younger students can easily influenced by peer or family pressure and may not vote freely. (1 point) Responses Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives. Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives. Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives. Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives. Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote. Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote. Voter turnout for elections can be low.

1 answer

The strongest evidence in Argument 1 is: "Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives."

This statement emphasizes the long-term benefits of engaging young people in the voting process, suggesting that early involvement in voting can lead to a lifetime habit of participation, thereby potentially increasing overall voter turnout and civic engagement in the future. This point is particularly compelling as it connects the idea of lowering the voting age to positive long-term electoral participation, reinforcing the argument for giving students a voice in elections.

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

GPT-4o mini · Answer

The strongest evidence in Argument 1 is: "Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives."

This statement emphasizes the long-term benefits of engaging young people in the voting process, suggesting that early involvement in voting can lead to a lifetime habit of participation, thereby potentially increasing overall voter turnout and civic engagement in the future. This point is particularly compelling as it connects the idea of lowering the voting age to positive long-term electoral participation, reinforcing the argument for giving students a voice in elections.