The author's perspective appears to be that of an objective analyst, presenting a straightforward interpretation of the age of consent laws and emphasizing the legal standpoint that minors cannot give informed consent. By framing the discussion within the context of criminal law, the author provides rational information that highlights the importance of protecting minors from exploitation, indicating a commitment to child welfare.
What is the perspective of the author/writer? (objective analyst, bias review, etc.)
Does the speaker/author offer reasonable or rational information? Explain.
age of consent/ Criminal Law Says Minors Can't Consent
2 sentences
1 answer
1 answer