What is the contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court?(1 point) Responses Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action. Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action. Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches. Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches. Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power. Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power. Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved. Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved.

Answer 1

The contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court is that judicial restraint means the court takes a more limited role and defers to the other branches of government, while judicial activism means the court takes a more active role and actively reviews and potentially overturns government actions.