The correct answer is:
- Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; it exercises self-restraint and defers to the decisions made by the legislative and executive branches. It interprets the Constitution narrowly and avoids making policy decisions.
- Judicial activism, on the other hand, means the court takes an active role in shaping and interpreting the law. It exercises its own preferences and values, often expanding the scope of individual rights and making policy decisions that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the Constitution.
what is the contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the supreme court?
judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved
judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on he issues of the branches.
judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action
judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power
1 answer