In discussing the strategy of including opposing points of view to strengthen your own argument, particularly in the context of a topic like the Bald Eagle, the author likely emphasizes the importance of presenting a balanced perspective in writing. By acknowledging and addressing counterarguments, the author can enhance the credibility of their position and demonstrate a well-rounded understanding of the issue.
In the case of the Bald Eagle, this might involve recognizing viewpoints that argue against certain conservation measures or policies, such as economic concerns of local communities or the impact of regulations on land use. By addressing these opposing views thoughtfully and providing evidence to counter them, the author can reinforce the importance of protecting the Bald Eagle and highlight the broader ecological and symbolic significance of the species.
Overall, the author may be advocating for a more nuanced approach to debates surrounding wildlife conservation, encouraging readers to consider multiple dimensions of the argument while ultimately supporting a strong case for the protection of the Bald Eagle.