Why "What Can You Do?" is a Bad Question to Ask a Minor
When engaging with minors on important societal issues, it's vital to consider their capacity for understanding, decision-making, and the ramifications of their responses. Asking a minor, "What is something that YOU can do to take action to solve this issue at the local, state, and federal level?" can be problematic for a multitude of reasons. In this essay, we will explore why this question might be inappropriate and potentially harmful to young individuals.
Maturity and Experience Gaps
One of the most significant factors to consider is the maturity and experience gap between adults and minors. Young people are still developing cognitively, emotionally, and socially. While many minors are capable of understanding complex issues, their life experiences may not fully equip them to provide thoughtful and informed responses about solving problems that require a nuanced understanding of policy and governance. Expecting them to come up with actionable solutions can be overwhelming and may lead to feelings of inadequacy or frustration.
Pressure and Responsibility
By asking minors to take action at local, state, and federal levels, adults may inadvertently place undue pressure on them. Young individuals might feel a sense of responsibility for issues they may not fully understand, leading to anxiety and emotional distress. This portrayal of issues as problems they are expected to fix can strip minors of their childhood, placing the burden of societal change on their young shoulders when it should primarily rest with adults.
Political and Social Awareness
Minors often lack the political awareness and knowledge required to effectively engage with complex issues. Their understanding may be shaped by limited experience, partial education, and even misinformation. Posing the question can unintentionally encourage young people to commit to causes or stances they do not fully grasp, potentially leading them to contribute to discussions with unqualified opinions or unfounded claims. It is crucial to recognize that social engagement should be based on informed decision-making.
Focus on Education over Activism
Instead of asking minors what actions they can take to solve societal issues, a more constructive approach would be to encourage education and critical thinking about the issues at hand. Educators and caregivers should focus on providing minors with the tools needed to understand complex phenomena. This includes teaching them about civic engagement, their rights, and ways they can contribute constructively without feeling the weight of the world on their shoulders.
Promoting Agency in Appropriate Contexts
While it is essential to promote agency and encourage young people to be active participants in their communities, this should be done in ways that align with their developmental stage. Inviting minors to participate in discussions and decision-making processes should respect their level of understanding and experience. Instead of placing the onus on their shoulders, we should empower and guide them to express their views and learn about civic responsibility in a supportive environment.
Conclusion
In summary, asking minors what actions they can take to solve issues at local, state, and federal levels is a question fraught with challenges. It overlooks the cognitive and emotional maturity of young individuals and places an unmerited burden of responsibility on them. Instead of demanding solutions from minors, we should focus on fostering their understanding and encouraging active participation in age-appropriate and supportive ways. This approach will not only allow for healthier development but will also encourage informed future leaders who can engage with societal issues in a meaningful way.
3 answers