The evidence that supports the reason provided includes:
-
The Nobel Prize in Literature has never before been awarded to a musician. - This supports the assertion that musicians are typically honored by awards designated for their craft, reinforcing the traditional boundaries of the Nobel Prize in Literature.
-
There are numerous awards associated with the work of musicians, including the Grammy, the Academy Award, and the Golden Globe, all of which Dylan has won. - This emphasizes the existence of awards specifically for musicians, reinforcing the point that traditionally, non-literary awards, rather than the Nobel Prize, have recognized their contributions.
-
Awarding the Nobel Prize in Literature to a popular songwriter makes traditional poetry seem less important. - This statement supports the reasoning by indicating that the choice to award Dylan may diminish the perceived significance of traditional forms of literature and poetry.
-
Anna North agrees and thinks that “by awarding the prize to him, the Nobel committee is choosing not to award it to a writer, and that is a disappointing choice.” - This opinion concurs with the reasoning by suggesting that awarding the prize to a musician is a deviation from the traditional intended recipients of the award, further underscoring the impact of this choice on the perception of literary merit.
All these points together bolster the reasoning that the Nobel Prize in Literature has distinct conventions that are at odds with awarding it to a musician.