Question
what distinguishes sound generalizations from misleading oversimplifications of historians work.
A. The use of specific historic events
B. Oversimplification come from asking the wrong questions
C. Comparisons between too many historical events
D. Unlike generalizations, oversimplifications are always wrong
A. The use of specific historic events
B. Oversimplification come from asking the wrong questions
C. Comparisons between too many historical events
D. Unlike generalizations, oversimplifications are always wrong
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The best answer to distinguish sound generalizations from misleading oversimplifications of historians' work is:
**A. The use of specific historic events**
Sound generalizations are usually based on a careful analysis of specific historical events and evidence, while misleading oversimplifications often ignore important nuances and contexts of those events. Generalizations can be valid if they are well-supported by historical data; oversimplifications tend to distort or misrepresent the complexity of historical narratives.
**A. The use of specific historic events**
Sound generalizations are usually based on a careful analysis of specific historical events and evidence, while misleading oversimplifications often ignore important nuances and contexts of those events. Generalizations can be valid if they are well-supported by historical data; oversimplifications tend to distort or misrepresent the complexity of historical narratives.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.