Hobbes and Locke had differing views on the primary object of government.
Thomas Hobbes believed that the primary object of government was to maintain order and prevent chaos, as he viewed human nature as self-interested and prone to conflict. He argued that a strong, centralized authority (or sovereign) was necessary to ensure peace and security.
In contrast, John Locke believed that the primary object of government was to protect the natural rights of individuals, specifically life, liberty, and property. He advocated for a government that derives its authority from the consent of the governed and is accountable to the people.
In summary, Hobbes focused on order and security, while Locke emphasized the protection of individual rights.