What describes the impact of the Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins case?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0ALitigants involved in federal litigation may move their case from federal court to a local state court.%0D%0ALitigants involved in federal litigation may move their case from federal court to a local state court.%0D%0A%0D%0AFederal courts must use the state law in question for state litigants in federal court.%0D%0AFederal courts must use the state law in question for state litigants in federal court.%0D%0A%0D%0AFederal courts must use federal common law for state litigants in federal court.%0D%0AFederal courts must use federal common law for state litigants in federal court.%0D%0A%0D%0ALitigants from different states may move their litigation from state court to federal court.%0D%0ALitigants from different states may move their litigation from state court to federal court.
1 answer
The impact of the Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins case is best described by the response: Federal courts must use the state law in question for state litigants in federal court.
This landmark decision established that federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction must apply state law rather than federal common law, thereby reinforcing the principle that state law governs in cases where state issues are at stake.
