To analyze the conclusions regarding the line segments \( \overline{MN} \) and \( \overline{M'N'} \), we need to consider what it means for these segments to have the same slope and what effect dilation has on their properties.
-
Conclusion #1 states that both line segments have a slope of 2 and that this proves the dilation does not pass through the center of dilation. This is generally not true; if both segments have the same slope, it reflects that they are parallel. A dilation centered at a certain point will preserve the angle and the proportionality of the lines, which could indicate a direct relationship between the originals and their dilations.
-
Conclusion #2 states that \( \overline{MN} \) and \( \overline{M'N'} \) both have a slope of 2 and that this proves the dilation passes through the center of dilation. This conclusion is more aligned with properties of dilation in geometry. If \( \overline{M'N'} \) is a dilation of \( \overline{MN} \), then it is expected that their slopes would be equal, and they remain parallel. Therefore, this suggests that the center of dilation indeed relates both segments.
Based on the analysis, if both line segments have the same slope and one is a dilated version of the other, Conclusion #2 is the correct interpretation:
Conclusion #2: \( \overline{MN} \) and \( \overline{M'N'} \) both have a slope of 2, which proves that the dilation passes through the center of dilation.