Responses
It is a reason for one module to outperform the other modules and potentially cause problems.
It is a reason for one module to outperform the other modules and potentially cause problems.
It is a perfectly healthy way to update legacy software, and there are no associated risks.
It is a perfectly healthy way to update legacy software, and there are no associated risks.
It is the source of introducing latency to the processes of legacy software.
It is the source of introducing latency to the processes of legacy software.
It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules.
It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules.
Skip to navigation
Item
1
, Fully Attempted.
Item
2
, Fully Attempted.
Item
3
, Unattempted.
Previous
Review
1 answer
The most appropriate consequence of updating only one module of legacy software, disregarding its effects on other modules, is:
It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules.
When one module is updated, it may rely on assumptions or interfaces that are not compatible with the other modules, leading to issues such as miscommunication, unexpected behavior, or even system failures.
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer