The two main differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution regarding the distribution of power are:
-
Centralized vs. Decentralized Power: The Articles of Confederation established a weak central government with most powers retained by the individual states. This led to difficulties in governance, as the national government had limited authority to enforce laws, regulate commerce, or collect taxes. In contrast, the Constitution created a stronger federal government with increased powers, including the ability to levy taxes, regulate interstate commerce, and maintain a standing army, thereby providing a more balanced distribution of power between state and federal governments.
-
Legislative Structure: Under the Articles of Confederation, there was a unicameral legislature (the Congress of the Confederation) that required a supermajority (nine out of thirteen states) to pass legislation, making it challenging to enact laws. The Constitution established a bicameral legislature (the U.S. Congress, composed of the House of Representatives and the Senate) with different powers and responsibilities, enabling more efficient lawmaking and representation, as well as easier passage of legislation with a simple majority in both chambers.
These differences reflect a significant shift towards a more balanced and effective federal framework in the Constitution compared to the Articles of Confederation.