Asked by Angel
What are the risks and challenges of “all or nothing” advocacy?
Answers
Answered by
PsyDAG
It ignores the possibility of <I>compromise</I>, in which various aspects (usually less important) are sacrificed so that more important aspects might be achieved. In compromise nobody gets "all," but also everyone gets something — in contrast to "nothing."
In contrast, "all or nothing" is more likely to lead to conflict and war.
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.
In contrast, "all or nothing" is more likely to lead to conflict and war.
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.