no columns. Why don't you make the table, and forget all that arrow stuff, and just name the segments or rays, as in MO bisects <PMN.
Give reasons where you have them, and take a stab at the missing ones.
What are the missing reasons in the two-column proof?
Given: modifying above with right arrow upper M upper O bisects angle upper P upper M upper N and modifying above with right arrow upper O upper M bisects angle upper P upper O upper N
Prove: triangle upper P upper M upper O congruent to triangle upper N upper M upper O
A two column proof and a diagram are shown.
1 answer