1. Diplomatic negotiations: Both governments could have engaged in extensive diplomatic negotiations, seeking a peaceful resolution to the conflicts and disagreements that had arisen between them. By addressing issues such as border disputes, economic disagreements, and differing interests, a peaceful settlement might have been reached.
2. Mediation: The governments could have sought the assistance of a neutral third party, such as a mediator or an international organization, to facilitate dialogue and promote understanding. Mediation could have helped bridge the gap between the two nations and find mutually acceptable solutions.
3. Compromise on territorial claims: The United States and Mexican governments could have engaged in negotiations focused on reaching a compromise on territorial claims, such as the disputed areas of Texas and the southwestern states. Finding a middle ground that satisfied both parties’ interests could have defused tensions and avoided military confrontation.
4. Economic cooperation: Promoting economic cooperation and trade between the two countries could have served as a foundation for improved relations. By working together to develop commercial ties and mutually beneficial economic agreements, both governments could have fostered a stronger relationship that prioritized compromise over conflict.
5. Respect for sovereignty: The governments could have committed to a mutual respect for each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity. By acknowledging and respecting Mexico's sovereignty, the United States could have avoided actions that would be perceived as aggressive or imperialistic, reducing the likelihood of military conflict. Similarly, Mexico could have respected the United States' claims and interests, working towards a peaceful coexistence.
What actions could the United States or Mexican governments have taken to avoid conflict from the Mexican-American war? Explain in five sentences.
1 answer