1. Yes, the principle of equality before the law was seen in the Lindy Chamberlain case. Despite facing public scrutiny and media backlash, Lindy and her husband were presumed innocent until proven guilty by the court.
2. No, the right to a fair trial was not fully upheld in the Lindy Chamberlain case. The overwhelming media attention and public opinion affected the trial, leading to a biased jury and a lack of impartiality in the legal proceedings.
3. No, there were concerns about the independence and unbiased nature of the judge and jury in the Lindy Chamberlain case. The intense media coverage and public opinion may have influenced their decision-making process, compromising the fairness of the trial.
4. Yes, Lindy Chamberlain had the right to appeal her conviction, and she ultimately did appeal multiple times before being exonerated. This demonstrates that the principle of the right to an appeal was upheld in her case.
Were the principles below seen(yes or no) in the Lindy chamberlain case and give reasons why seen or not.
1. Equality before the law (i.e. innocent until proven guilty)
2. Right to a fair trial
3. Independent and unbiased judge/jury
4. Right to an appeal
1 answer