Question
We consider a 1-dimensional logistic regression problem, i.e., assume that data \, X_ i \in \mathbb {R}, i = 1, \dots , n \, is given and that get independent observations of
Y_ i | X_ i \sim \textsf{Ber}\left( \frac{\mathbf e^{\beta X_ i}}{1 + \mathbf e^{\beta X_ i}} \right),
where \, \beta \in \mathbb {R} \,.
Moreover, recall that the associated log likelihood for \, \beta \, is then given by
\ell (\beta ) = \sum _{i=1}^{n} \left( Y_ i X_ i \beta - \ln (1 + \exp (X_ i \beta )) \right)
Calculate the first and second derivate of \, \ell \,. Instructions: The summation \sum _{i=1}^{n} is already placed to the left of the answer box. Enter the summands in terms of \beta, X_ i (enter “X_i") and Y_ i (enter “Y_i").
\displaystyle \ell '(\beta ) = \sum _{i=1}^{n}
unanswered
\displaystyle \ell ^{\prime \prime }(\beta ) = \sum _{i=1}^{n}
unanswered
What can you conclude about \, \ell '(\beta ) \,?
Y_ i | X_ i \sim \textsf{Ber}\left( \frac{\mathbf e^{\beta X_ i}}{1 + \mathbf e^{\beta X_ i}} \right),
where \, \beta \in \mathbb {R} \,.
Moreover, recall that the associated log likelihood for \, \beta \, is then given by
\ell (\beta ) = \sum _{i=1}^{n} \left( Y_ i X_ i \beta - \ln (1 + \exp (X_ i \beta )) \right)
Calculate the first and second derivate of \, \ell \,. Instructions: The summation \sum _{i=1}^{n} is already placed to the left of the answer box. Enter the summands in terms of \beta, X_ i (enter “X_i") and Y_ i (enter “Y_i").
\displaystyle \ell '(\beta ) = \sum _{i=1}^{n}
unanswered
\displaystyle \ell ^{\prime \prime }(\beta ) = \sum _{i=1}^{n}
unanswered
What can you conclude about \, \ell '(\beta ) \,?
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
To calculate the first derivative of \(\ell(\beta)\), we need to differentiate each term in the summation with respect to \(\beta\) and sum them up:
\[\ell'(\beta) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(Y_i X_i - \frac{X_i e^{\beta X_i}}{1 + e^{\beta X_i}}\right)\]
To calculate the second derivative of \(\ell(\beta)\), we need to differentiate each term in the first derivative with respect to \(\beta\) and sum them up:
\[\ell''(\beta) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(-\frac{X_i^2 e^{\beta X_i}}{(1 + e^{\beta X_i})^2} - \frac{X_i^2 e^{\beta X_i}}{1 + e^{\beta X_i}} + \frac{X_i^2 e^{2\beta X_i}}{(1 + e^{\beta X_i})^2}\right)\]
From the first derivative, we can conclude that \(\ell'(\beta)\) represents the gradient or the direction of steepest ascent of the log-likelihood function \(\ell(\beta)\). This means that it tells us in which direction \(\beta\) should be adjusted to maximize \(\ell(\beta)\).
Note: This is not financial advice, and should not be taken as such.
\[\ell'(\beta) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(Y_i X_i - \frac{X_i e^{\beta X_i}}{1 + e^{\beta X_i}}\right)\]
To calculate the second derivative of \(\ell(\beta)\), we need to differentiate each term in the first derivative with respect to \(\beta\) and sum them up:
\[\ell''(\beta) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(-\frac{X_i^2 e^{\beta X_i}}{(1 + e^{\beta X_i})^2} - \frac{X_i^2 e^{\beta X_i}}{1 + e^{\beta X_i}} + \frac{X_i^2 e^{2\beta X_i}}{(1 + e^{\beta X_i})^2}\right)\]
From the first derivative, we can conclude that \(\ell'(\beta)\) represents the gradient or the direction of steepest ascent of the log-likelihood function \(\ell(\beta)\). This means that it tells us in which direction \(\beta\) should be adjusted to maximize \(\ell(\beta)\).
Note: This is not financial advice, and should not be taken as such.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.