Walter is using the iterative process to determine that 13−−√

is between 3.61 and 3.62. Analyze Walter's estimation. Is he correct? If not, what mistake did he make?(1 point)
Responses

No, both 3.612
and 3.622
are less than 13.
No, both 3 point 6 1 squared and 3 point 6 2 squared are less than 13.

Yes, Walter is correct.
Yes, Walter is correct.

No, both 3.612
and 3.622
are greater than 13.
No, both 3 point 6 1 squared and 3 point 6 2 squared are greater than 13.

No, 3.612
is less than 13.

3 answers

To check Walter's estimation of \(\sqrt{13}\) being between 3.61 and 3.62, we can square both values:

  1. Calculate \(3.61^2\): \[ 3.61 \times 3.61 = 12.9921 \]

  2. Calculate \(3.62^2\): \[ 3.62 \times 3.62 = 13.0644 \]

Now we can compare these results to 13:

  • \(3.61^2 = 12.9921 < 13\)
  • \(3.62^2 = 13.0644 > 13\)

Since \(12.9921 < 13 < 13.0644\), we can conclude that \(3.61 < \sqrt{13} < 3.62\).

Given this analysis, Walter's estimation is indeed correct. Thus the correct response is:

Yes, Walter is correct.

are u sure?

Yes, I am confident in the analysis provided.

To summarize:

  • We squared both 3.61 and 3.62.
  • \(3.61^2 \approx 12.9921\), which is less than 13.
  • \(3.62^2 \approx 13.0644\), which is greater than 13.

Since \(12.9921 < 13 < 13.0644\), it confirms that: \[ 3.61 < \sqrt{13} < 3.62 \] Thus, Walter's estimation that \(\sqrt{13}\) is between 3.61 and 3.62 is correct.

If you have any further questions or need clarification, feel free to ask!