Viktoriya's error lies in her conclusion after simplifying the equation. Let's analyze the steps she took:
-
Original Equation: \( 5(x - 2) - 3x = 2(x - 3) - 16 \)
-
Distributing: \( 5x - 10 - 3x = 2x - 6 - 16 \)
-
Combining Like Terms:
- Left side: \( 5x - 3x = 2x \) → becomes \( 2x - 10 \)
- Right side: \( -6 - 16 = -22 \) → becomes \( 2x - 22 \)
Now it simplifies to: \( 2x - 10 = 2x - 22 \)
-
Subtracting \( 2x \) from both sides: This leads to: \( -10 = -22 \)
This final statement is a contradiction, indicating that there is no solution to the equation.
So, Viktoriya's error is in incorrectly concluding that the equation has infinitely many solutions. Instead, based on her simplification which led to a contradiction, she should have said that the equation has no solution.
Therefore, the correct choice describing Viktoriya's error is: Viktoriya should have said that the equation has no solution.