In economics, positive and normative questions serve different purposes and are rooted in distinct methodologies.
Positive Economics deals with objective statements that describe and predict economic phenomena. It focuses on what is and can be tested with data. For example, a positive question might be, "What is the effect of raising interest rates on inflation?" This question can be answered through empirical research and data analysis, as it is based on observable facts and causal relationships.
Normative Economics, on the other hand, involves subjective judgments about what ought to be. It addresses value-based questions and opinions, such as "Should the government increase the minimum wage?" These questions depend on individual beliefs, societal values, and ethical considerations, making them inherently more subjective.
Reasons Why Positive Questions Are Easier to Answer:
-
Objectivity: Positive questions can be answered based on data and factual analysis, whereas normative questions involve personal values and beliefs, which can vary widely among individuals.
-
Empirical Testing: Positive economics is rooted in the scientific method, allowing for hypotheses to be tested and validated using statistical tools and data. Normative questions often lack empirical testability because they deal with opinions rather than measurable phenomena.
-
Clarity of Focus: Positive questions typically have a clear focus on cause-and-effect relationships, making it easier to gather relevant information and analyze it. In contrast, normative questions can be more complex and multifaceted, as they often encompass a range of ethical considerations.
-
Lack of Consensus: In normative economics, different individuals or groups may hold conflicting values, leading to disagreements. This variability makes it challenging to reach a definitive answer. Positive questions, by contrast, tend to have more objective consensus because they rely on universally accepted principles of logic and empirical evidence.
In summary, the empirical and objective nature of positive economics allows for clearer, more definitive answers, while the subjective, value-laden nature of normative questions makes them more complex and contentious.