To determine which statement about seventeenth-century trade is true based on the options provided, let's analyze each one:
A) Fragmented trade routes left much of India, China, and Japan isolated.
This statement is likely false, as during the seventeenth century, India, China, and Japan were actively engaged in trade with various parts of the world, despite having some fragmented trade networks.
B) Fragmented trade routes isolated South America and New Holland.
This statement seems inaccurate as well. South America was involved in transatlantic trade, particularly driven by Spanish and Portuguese interests, while New Holland (the Dutch settlements) was actively trading in the region.
C) Established trade routes connected East New Holland with Asia and Africa.
This statement is plausible. The Dutch were quite active in trade during this period, particularly in the East Indies, linking New Holland (mainly referring to Australian territories) with trade routes to Asia and Africa.
D) Established trade routes connected Japan to South Africa to Dutch colonies.
While trade relations were established with Japan, the direct connection to South Africa and Dutch colonies doesn't reflect a prominent trade route.
Based on these evaluations, the most accurate statement would be:
C) Established trade routes connected East New Holland with Asia and Africa.