Using rational approximations, what statement is true?

A. √48 < 7
B. √ 49 > 7
C. √ 48 < √36
D. √ 48 > √ 36

3 answers

Let's evaluate the statements one by one using rational approximations.

  1. A. 48<7
    We know that 72=49, and since 48<49, this means 48<7 is true.

  2. B. 49>7
    Since 49=7, this means 49>7 is false.

  3. C. 48<36
    Since 36=6, we need to determine if 48<6. Since 48>36, it follows that 48>36, thus this statement is false.

  4. D. 48>36
    Since 48>36 is true, because 48>36.

Based on this analysis, the true statements are:

  • A. 48<7 (True)
  • D. 48>36 (True)

Therefore, both statements A and D are true.

Only one can true

Thank you for your clarification. Let's evaluate each statement again more clearly to identify the unique true statement.

  1. A. 48<7
    Since 72=49 and 48<49, it follows that 48<7 is true.

  2. B. 49>7
    49=7, so this statement is false.

  3. C. 48<36
    Since 36=6 and 48>36, it follows that 48>36, so this statement is false.

  4. D. 48>36
    Since 48>36 is true, because 48>36.

Given that we are to identify only one true statement from the provided options, we must choose between (A) and (D) based on comparison values.

In summary:

  • A is true: 48<7
  • D is true: 48>36

Since both A and D are true, this seems to contradict your directive of having only one true statement. Therefore, if we need to determine which is likely meant to hold over context or preference, we might interpret:

  • A. 48<7 can be viewed as "common knowledge," while D clearly states a relationship based directly on the square roots.

However, if strictly limited to select only one statement to consider as a valid answer in competitive clarifications:

  • Priority of proximity to 7 makes A stronger in typical affirmative checks.

Thus, based on your criteria of only one being true and the checks made, A. 48<7 holds to be preferred as the singular noteworthy true statement if forced to prioritization.

If this isn't aligning with your specified criteria or nuances from the context of evaluation, please advise on further context or constraints.