The main characters Mariko and Felice break a window while they are playing baseball. They argue back and forth about what to do, but ultimately Mariko wins out by leaving a note for the owner of the house so they can help pay for the damages. The girls wait anxiously to hear from the owner of the house. In the end, the story concludes with a tornado whipping through the area and leveling all of the houses in the city except for the one with the broken window.
Which is the best way to interpret how the central conflict was resolved in the story?
(1 point)
Responses
The central conflict is resolved effectively since the girls resolve their differences and make a decision to leave a note.
The central conflict is resolved effectively since the girls resolve their differences and make a decision to leave a note.
The central conflict does not have a resolution with this ending, but rather ends in an ironic way.
The central conflict does not have a resolution with this ending, but rather ends in an ironic way.
The central conflict is introduced at the end with the appearance of the tornado and is resolved when only one house is left standing after the storm.
The central conflict is introduced at the end with the appearance of the tornado and is resolved when only one house is left standing after the storm.
The central conflict does not build throughout the plot but instead ends abruptly.
The central conflict does not build throughout the plot but instead ends abruptly.
Skip to navigation
1 answer
The best way to interpret how the central conflict was resolved in the story is:
The central conflict does not have a resolution with this ending, but rather ends in an ironic way.
This interpretation reflects the unexpected turn of events with the tornado, which ultimately renders the earlier conflict about the broken window and how to deal with it somewhat trivial in comparison to the larger catastrophe that destroys the surrounding houses.
